|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- CONSIDERATION BY THE CITY OF DIBOLL GOING FROM A GENERAL LAW TYPE A CITY
TO A HOME RULE CITY IN CONSIDERATION OF AN ACTIVE ANNEXATION POLICY.
|
|
3
|
- “IS A GRANT OF A DEGREE OF LOCAL AUTONOMY TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS BY
CONSTITUTION OR STATUTE”
- ONLY 19 CITIES WITH A POPULATION OVER 5,000 IN THE STATE OF TEXAS IS NOT
HOME RULE
|
|
4
|
- REVIEW THE POSSIBILITY OF CONSIDERING GOING HOME RULE
- REVIEW THE REQUIREMENTS TO MAKE THE CHANGE
- PROS AND CONS OF HOME RULE
|
|
5
|
- ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE BY AT LEAST 2/3 VOTE OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO SUBMIT THE ISSUES TO VOTERS.
- ALLOWS CITIZENS AN OPPORTUNITY TO ELECT A COMMISSION THAT WOULD DRAFT A
CHARTER
- “SHOULD A COMMISSION BE CHOSEN TO DRAFT A NEW CHARTER FOR THE CITY OF
DIBOLL?”
|
|
6
|
- ELECTIONS HELD ON NEXT GENERAL ELECTION (NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS)
- VOTE ON COMMISSION AND VOTING ON THE SELECTION OF THE CHARTER COMMISSION
MEMBERS ON SAME BALLOT BUT DIFFERENT QUESTIONS
- AT LEAST 15 MEMBERS ON THE COMMISSION WITH NO PARTY DESIGNATION
|
|
7
|
- GOVERNING BODY MAY SELECT A CHARTER COMMISSION
- CHARTER COMMISSION MAY BE SELECTED AT A MASS MEETING OR
- THE MAYOR OF THE MUNICIPALITY MAY APPOINT A CHARTER COMMISSION
- CITIZENS WILL VOTE ON CHARTER
|
|
8
|
- ANNEXATION LAW IS MORE FAVORABLE
- MORE LOCAL CONTROL AND AUTHORITY--MUNICIPAL ORGANIZATION
- INITIATIVE-REFERENDUM-RECALL
- COST TO DO SO IS MINIMAL
- RESULTS IN MORE INFORMED/INVOLVED CITIZENS
|
|
9
|
- CAN BE DIVISIVE TO A COMMUNITY
- CHARTER’S CAN BE SUBJECT TO LEGAL CHALLENGES
- CHARTER AMENDMENTS CAN BE USED BY REFORMERS TO LIMIT THE ROLE OF THE
CITY
- GENERAL LAW CITIES ANNEXATION LAWS ARE TOO RESTRICTIVE
|
|
10
|
- COUNCIL CAN DECIDE IN FUTURE MEETINGS ON WHETHER TO SEEK HOME RULE AND
HOW TO PROCEED
- IF COUNCIL CHOOSES TO PROCEED CHOOSE AN ELECTION DATE
|
|
11
|
|